Site icon ITCCCA

Andre De Grasse, Stuart McMillan, and Sub-Max Training

American distance coaches are dancing in the streets. Matthew Centrowicz shocked the world by winning the 1500 in Rio. Mike Newman of DyeStat tweeted that no American had won the 1500 since 1908, the same year the Cubs last won the World Series. Later, when Paul Chelimo of the U.S. Army won silver, Illini Cross Country Coach Jake Stewart tweeted, “Did we just become the best distance running country in the world?”

Yes, distance coaches from sea to shining sea probably doubled their mileage on their Sunday morning run, pushing the pace so they could watch the Olympic Marathon.

Before you distance coaches get too giddy, let’s not forget that 16 of the 36 distance medalists (800 meters and up) have coaches currently under formal investigation or federations in breach of anti-doping rules. When we worship millionaire athletes, we set ourselves up for disappointment.

I love every track & field event, but the sprints are my favorite.

Distance coaches found another reason to celebrate this week. Andre De Grasse won silver by training slow. Yes, the coach of Andre De Grasse informed his 8,430 followers on Twitter, “For those of you who think you have to sprint maximally to get faster – not once all year did Andre De Grasse sprint at maximal speed …”

There you have it. Stuart McMillan has given every distance coach in America something to smile about. Running is running. Distance runners run 400 meter repeats. Sprinters run 200 meter repeats. Old school sprint coaches will also exchange high fives. All that SPRINT FAST TO GET FAST was a hoax perpetuated by lazy sprinters and the coaches who enable them.

In a follow up tweet, Stuart McMillan went on to add:

… rhythm, timing, technique, coordination, fluidity, flow, etc. – all abilities that can be improved via sub-maximal sprinting.

 

I’m happy Stuart made no mention of conditioning, tempo runs, speed endurance, VO2 max, or building an aerobic engine. There’s no talk of grind, grit, or mental toughness. I like rhythm, timing, technique, coordination, fluidity, flow, etc., but I also believe you must train fast to run fast.

Stuart McMillan is probably a great guy. I’ve read his stuff. By his pictures, Stuart looks counter-culture. I love that. I may look like a conservative, but my mind is definitely rebellious.

Stuart McMillan

Stuart McMillan is the Performance Director at ALTIS, also known as the World Athletic Center in Arizona. McMillan has coached dozens of Olympians who have won dozens of Olympic medals. Many people would consider Stuart McMillan the world’s greatest sprint coach.

I’m just a coach at high school in Illinois, but I disagree with the world’s greatest sprint coach. Stuart McMillan may boast of sub-max training leading to a  bronze and silver medal for Andre De Grasse, but I respectfully disagree. Is there room for differing opinions here?

First, let’s look at Andre De Grasse. About four years ago, Andre De Grasse was a high school basketball player at a suburban Toronto high school. He was talked into running the 100 meters at a track meet his senior year. Andre ran the race in basketball shorts, basketball shoes, and no starting blocks. People laughed. Then Andre De Grasse shocked those in attendance running 10.90. Who was his sprint coach? Who taught Andre De Grasse the rhythm, timing, technique, coordination, fluidity, and flow needed to run 10.90?

The story of Andre De Grasse reminds me of Donald Thomas. Donald Thomas was a basketball player at a very small college. He played on Lindenwood’s JV basketball team. One of Lindenwood’s track athletes bet Thomas he could not clear 6’6″ in the high jump. With no experience and no training, Donald Thomas cleared 7’0″.  A couple years later, Donald Thomas won the World Championship in Japan, jumping 7′ 08″.  Good coaching!

Back to the subject of Andre De Grasse. De Grasse went from Toronto to Coffeyville (Kansas) Community College before attending USC. Andre De Grasse shocked the world running wind-aided times of 9.75 and 19.58 to win the NCAA 100 and 200. Those wind-aided times (+2.7 and +2.4) ranked as the 7th and 6th fastest times in the history of the world in any conditions. How fast were De Grasse’s wind-legal times?

Enter Stuart McMillan. Andre De Grasse joined ALTIS at the end of 2015 (December). Nine months later, Andre De Grasse became an Olympic star at the age of 21.

Training at sub-max speeds focusing on rhythm, timing, technique, coordination, fluidity, and flow made Andre De Grasse faster? What am I missing here? In 2015, De Grasse ran 9.92. In the Olympics he ran 9.91. In 2015, De Grasse ran 19.88. In the Olympics he ran 20.02. And, don’t forget, De Grasse ran wind-aided 9.75 and 19.58 as a college student at USC.

I’m not picking a fight with Stuart McMillan. I would pay $100 (or more) to have a beer with the guy. But how can Coach McMillan boldly claim that sub-maximal training made Andre De Grasse faster?

Was Andre De Grasse healthy and successful in Rio? Yes! Maybe Stuart McMillan had a conservative training plan. Not a bad idea. Actually, I may have played it safe too. I really didn’t believe Usain Bolt would repeat. How has Usain Bolt defied age? Nine months ago, if someone would have asked me to pick the top Olympic sprinter at Rio in 2016, I would have picked Bolt … if healthy. If not, my pick would have been Andre De Grasse. Anyone who did not see De Grasse as Bolt’s heir apparent was not paying attention.

I blame the top-notch sprint coach from McKendree University for getting me all fired up. Brandon Murphy, former Illinois Class A 100 & 200 champ (10.90, 22.22) from Macomb, messaged me about the McMillan tweet. Yes, Brandon, without you, this article never gets written.

Here was my response to Coach Murphy, “If you and I had a raw 21-year old sprinter who had run 9.75, we would have a good chance at producing  a 9.91 sprinter after a year of training.”

I was agitated all day. Usually when I send Chris Korfist a three question text, he returns a one word answer. When I sent the McMillan quote, the always parasympathetic Chris Korfist got fired up

“Stuart McMillan has a guy (De Grasse) who is at the limits of what a human can run and needs fine tuning. We have kids who are a long way from there neurologically. In fact most people are a long way from there. If we trained our kids sub-max, the ceiling would stay low. A cheetah is a cheetah. But to get a warthog to run like a cheetah, that is different.” – Chris Korfist

A cheetah is a cheetah. But to get a warthog to run like a cheetah, that is different. – Chris Korfist

Coaches are allowed to train their athletes however they choose. Every athlete is different in their response to training. What works with one sprinter may injure another sprinter. I respect the training methods of Stuart McMillan, but I will never train high school sprinters like he trained Andre De Grasse.

Who gets credit for producing great athletes? Oregon Track & Field tweeted a quote from the Washington Post, “Oregon produces Olympic runners like Kentucky produces NBA players.” Produces? I say bullsh*t. Kentucky recruits and attracts future NBA players. Oregon recruits and attracts future Olympians. Jim Calipari is a terrific coach. Oregon’s track staff might be the best. However, I believe talent is nurtured and fine-tuned, not produced.

This year I may coach one of the fastest freshmen in the country. Plainfield North has an incoming freshman who ran a wind-legal 10.81 to win AAU Nationals. 10.81 set a record for boys 14 and under. Who gets the credit? God? His AAU coach?

If I take an incoming freshmen who runs 10.81 and he runs 10.80 nine months later, should I take credit for his success? Will I tweet about how my “train fast to run fast” program created a 10.80 sprinter? Does my training produce elite athletes, national champions, and Olympians?

I will take credit for our track schedule, our uniforms, and our team culture. If we over-achieve in the 4×1, I might brag about our hand-offs. I will not take credit for elite talent.

I am thankful I work with teenagers. Working with professional athletes would not be fun for me. Andre De Grasse turned pro nine months ago and signed a contract with Puma for 11.25 million dollars. No matter how clean the athlete, professionals never escape the dark cloud of performance enhancing drugs. Big Sport tweeted “Of the 30 fastest 100 meter times, 21 are by athletes who’ve tested positive for drugs. The other 9 are all Usain Bolt.”

The fact that Usain Bolt has passed every drug test does not keep people from wondering how an island of 2.7 million people can dominate the sprint world. Texas has 27 million people.

Remember, many athletes passed their drug tests only to be found to be cheaters later. The list is long. See Lance Armstrong. The internet is full of conspiracy theories concerning Bolt’s association with Angel Hernandez who used to go by Angel Heredia when he was a BALCO chemist. I’m not accusing Bolt of anything, but if he’s dirty, that tweet by Big Sport becomes ominous. By the way, Angel Heredia once told Germany’s Der Spiegel, “The difference between 10.0 and 9.7 is the drugs.”  I didn’t say that, Angel did.

I had a blast watching Olympic track & field. I can’t wait to experience the Olympic bump this year in high school track & field. I can’t wait to train my sprinters with rhythm, timing, technique, coordination, fluidity, flow, and especially, max speed.

Exit mobile version